Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a overall score of 86.3 against 76. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is much lighter and thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), even though it was released 4 years before. Galaxy S10e has a better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy S10e features a way better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, a way tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lot worse quality photographs and videos and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.