Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s overall score of 76. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is noticeably older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little higher count of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery size. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor, worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.