Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a overall score of 98 against 76. Both devices in this review have the same Android 13 operating system. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is just a bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it's just a little heavier and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) count with quite similar batteries duration.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.