Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 95.4 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is just a little bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it is heavier and was released just 15 months before. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really superior hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a greater camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a larger aperture to take better low light captures, a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) and Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.