Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s global score of 76. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's body is way lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released 9 years before.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a lot better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per screen inch.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lot smaller sensor which offers a way worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.