Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s score of 76. Galaxy S7 is an much older phone than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S7 has a much better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture and a lot tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.