Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-06-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 78.1 score against 76. Even though Galaxy S7 edge is noticeably older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is thinner and extremely lighter. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version, giving some additional features and improved performance.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a very superior processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores. The Galaxy S7 edge features a sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light environments and a much tinier camera sensor providing a much worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.