Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having an 81.9 score against 76. Galaxy S8 Active's body is older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater screen density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S8 Active features a really superior performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features improved battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor capturing lot lower quality images and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.