Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting an 81 score against 76. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover Pro is a way older, a bit thicker and a little heavier device than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have a 0.25 inches back camera sensor, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.