Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a quite larger display, a just a little greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, a much tinier back camera sensor taking lot lower quality pictures and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.