Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a global score of 92.3 against 76. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is a bit lighter and extremely thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better performing processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot tinier sensor providing a much worse image quality, worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.