Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot older and extremely heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's construction is still much thinner. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much faster CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, slower 30 fps video frame rate and a much smaller sensor which gives a much worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.