Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting an 81.3 score against 75.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a better memory for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.