Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting a overall score of 87.1 against 75.2. The LG Velvet design is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), even though it was released 4 years before. LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG Velvet has a much better performing processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG Velvet takes much better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a camera with less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features just a bit more memory for apps and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.