Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-05-30 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with a score of 79.6 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy A40's body is a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it was released 5 years before. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A40 has an older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
The Galaxy A40 counts with a very superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A40 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per display inch.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way higher resolution back camera. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 2 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a superior battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.