Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it was released many years before. The Galaxy A50 features an extremely better processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A50 has a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little better pixels amount in each inch of display. The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.