Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-05-30 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting a general score of 86.6 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
The Galaxy A50s features a much greater performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A50s features a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display pixels density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 2 TB. The Galaxy A50s features a lot better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in low-light situations.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.