Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 general score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an notably older device than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but it's a little thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A51 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit better pixel density.
Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments and a camera with less mega pixels. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has an external SD slot that holds up to 2 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.