Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), having a 90.8 score against 75.2. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is a bit lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much faster processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a camera with lesser megapixels and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.