Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 global score. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A71's body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
The Galaxy A71 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). Both of them have a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a display of the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has an external memory slot that allows up to 2 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much faster CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.