Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with a overall score of 90.8 against 75.2. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but they are equally thin. The Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). Both have the same pixels density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen with the same size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 2 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% more battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.