Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting a score of 98.9 against 75.2. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), it's construction is still a little thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a greater pixel amount in each inch of display and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.