Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with an 81.2 score against 75.2. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but both of them are 0.33inches thick.
Galaxy Note 3 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a quite smaller display and a little worse screen pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 3 captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video and a way less MP resolution camera in the back. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.