Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s global score of 75.2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), even though it was released 9 years before.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 2 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with a much worse 16 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.