Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting an 86.2 score against 75.2. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is incredibly older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). These devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). Both of them have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a display of the same size and the same number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite captures clearer photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.