Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s general score of 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it was released many years before. Galaxy Note5 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Note5 has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity. Galaxy Note5 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.