Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting a general score of 94.8 against 75.2. The Galaxy S20 construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it was released 4 years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Galaxy S20 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The Galaxy S20 shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.