Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 FE body has the same thickness and weight than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024).
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bit better pixel density. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 2 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE captures better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.