Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 general score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), we must note that it is also an a lot older, just a little thicker and heavier phone. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because it has a better number of pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 2 TB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.