Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 overall score. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a noticeably older and just a little thicker phone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but Samsung could make it lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has 4.4.2 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a way better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S5 Sport takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 2 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.