Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with a 92.3 score against 75.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot older than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), it's design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit better pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a way less megapixels camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.