Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting a 94.6 score against 75.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an extremely older and noticeably heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.