Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with a overall score of 90.6 against 75.2. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot older and incredibly heavier than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), it's design is still incredibly thinner. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.