Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), having a 79 score against 75.2. Despite being the best phone in this review, we must highlight that it is also incredibly older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). They have the same count of pixels per display inch, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a same size screen. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels, they both have the same aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a battery life that is very similar to the battery duration in Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.