Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| -- | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a global score of 78.8 against 71.9. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Google Pixel 3a has a very superior performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3a has a much sharper screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 2 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.