Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| -- | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s general score of 71.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). Both have a same size screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) and nubia Red Magic 3S both count with quite similar cameras, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a lesser mega pixels resolution back camera and a way tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way better video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 2 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a battery performance that is just as good as the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.