Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 424 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a 75.8 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a way smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 2 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.