Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a score of 85.5 against 71.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A51 features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.