Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a general score of 90.8 against 71.9. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 2 TB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a more mega pixels back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.