Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a general score of 91.1 against 71.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a lot better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a lot better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has an external SD slot that holds up to 2 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52s captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.