Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2018-11-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 392 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s 71.9 global score. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 2 TB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has greater battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.