Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| -- | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 362 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a score of 97.6 against 71.9. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Fold counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy Fold features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.