Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s 71.9 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.