Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with a score of 81.2 against 71.9. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an extremely better processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.