Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with a 79.3 score against 71.9. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.