Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s score of 71.9. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an incredibly better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.