Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| -- | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s 71.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). Both of them have a display of the same size. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.