Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a score of 79.5 against 71.9. Galaxy Note7 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster). Galaxy Note7 has a lot better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.