Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-02-03 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having an 89.7 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). They have a same size display. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S10 Lite takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with a worse resolution, a lot tinier back camera sensor and a worse video quality.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.