Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a score of 90.8 against 71.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 FE features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a superior camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.